The MPH program is one of the nine (9) program entities that underwent internal self-assessment conducted by the five(5) stakeholders of the program, namely: students, faculty, nonacademic, alumni and employer. Using the standard questionnaire designed and implemented by the University Grants Commission-QAU, data and information about the program were generated in each of the nine areas covering  both the university and program entity. The findings of the self-assessment were documented and presented to the stakeholders which eventually, served as inputs to the final self-assessment report. There are interesting  information derived from the survey which made the SAR substantive. The highlights of the report is the SWOT which identifies the strength, weakness, opportunities and threats of the program. The EPR Reviewers are composed of the following prominent personalities both in the subject and QA process. The EPR Team is chaired by Prof. Dr. Darryl Raymund Johnson Macer, President, American Universityt of Soveriegn Nations (AUSN), USA. He is also the President and Professor of Bioethics and Bio Medical Sciences; Dr. Anisur Rahman, Professor and Head of th Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Preventive & Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Mohakhali, Subject Expert, Member; Prof. Dr. Muhammad Mahboob Ali, Dhaka School of Economics, QA Expert, Member. The EPR Team had an intensive interaction with the Deans, Directors, Department Heads, Campus Officers, and other officers of the university. All were conversant of their respective responsibilities and truly impressive. The support of the IQAC provided evidence to validate oral explanation with the documentary exhibits. The Management explanation of the present process of operation including students services, HR, Administration, Logistics, Admission Process, Ranking and Promotion of Faculty, Welfare and Benefits and many other aspects of development and standard operating procedures. After three day of review, the Team presented the exit report and the judgement with a rating of EXCELLENT. Congratulations to all those who are responsible in making the EPR a resounding success. Thank you EPR Team for the positive and construction recommendations. The SAC will reflect on this in formulating the Improvement Plan of the mph.